Dual Entry Safes
|
|
Master Lock 265DCCSEN Dual-Function Security Bar $15.75 The Master Lock Dual Function Security Bar provides your home with an added dose of safety by reinforcing doors from outside intruders. Built with Master Lock’s world renowned durability, the Security Bar is constructed of 20-gauge steel to withstand more than 350 pounds of force, helping ensure that your doors remain securely shut. With a versatile and adjustable design, the bar fits most hinged … |
|
|
High-Security Sliding Window Lock – 3-Second Installation $0.79 Windows and doors that slide open are a favorite entry point for criminals. They open & close silently and factory-installed locks & latches are often easy to defeat. This simple and reliable lock grabs onto window or door track and prevents further opening. Also lets you set maximum window-opening size – a great way to safeguard upper-level windows for children…. |
|
|
SentrySafe ESB-3 Electronic Security Box, 0.23 Cubic Feet, Black $26.99 … |
|
|
Masscool NAS-390UES2R 3.5-inch Dual Bay NAS SATA to USB2.0 & eSATA External Enclosure w/ Western Digital Caviar Green WD15EADS 1.5TB 32MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5 Internal Hard Drive x2 build in Totally 3TB Specifications: Interface/Ports : USB 2.0 port x1 eSATA port x1 10/100 T-LAN port x1 Structure Material : Rigid Aluminum body, Metal tray Internal HDD support : 3.5 inch SATA HDD x2 Max Storage : 1TB x2 HDD Function : JBOD, BIG, Raid 0, 1, SAFE33, SAFE55 Data Transfer : eSATA up to 3.0Gbps USB 480Mbps LAN operation utility : FTP/SMB Server DHCP Server/Client Static IP support P2P M… |
|
|
AT&T 993 Corded Phone, Black, 1 Handset $75.53 The AT&T 993 Corded 2-Line Speakerphone is perfect for a small business that needs a telephone that supports two lines. You can make and receive calls by using the keypad and Speakerphone in the base station. The phone’s three-party conferencing lets you conduct business with three people conversing together on three different lines. Automatic line selection means that when the phone is ringing an… |
|
|
Viper Responder 350 2-way Car Alarm Security System w/ Keyless Entry, One LCD 2-way Remote and One 4-button 1-way Remote $109.00 Viper is proud to introduce our most affordable 2-Way security system, which will wrap your vehicle in protection, with the most sophisticated electronic technologies available today, including the Stinger DoubleGuard shock sensor, Revenger six-tone siren and Failsafe Starter Kill. This state-of-the-art system also offers in-demand convenience feature like keyless entry. Comes with one 2-Way and o… |
|
|
HANCHETT ENTRY 10260401 9600-12/24-630, Strike Wood/Metal Door $235.00 9600-12/24-630, Strike Wood/Metal Door… |
Dual Entry Safes
Blue Book Value on 2004 Civic. Also is this car a safe purchase?
Part 1, I need for someone to help me out and get a value on 2004 Civic. specifications and options are Honda Civic Ex 2004, 53,946 miles 4 cyl, automatic, black. Options are power steering, tachometer, sunroof,cd player, ac, rear window defroster, power door locks,tilt steering wheel, cloth,intermittent wipers, power windows, cruise control, key less entry, abs, dual air bags.
Now part 2 of my question is, this car looks fantastic, no scratches dents or dings. i’m interested in this car, but when I pulled up the carfax, the title is clean, but it has a report of accident. The title is not salvaged or anything. On the carfax the accident took place on may of 2008, the car basically hit the curb and was towed. Should I completely avoid this car, or should I visit the dealership take a look at it and test drive it? (Looked at the car photos from dealership’s website.) They’re asking 8,900 for the car.
PRICE IS NOT BAD
I WOULD GO TO THE DEALER TAKE IT FOR DRIVE THEN GO TO HONDA DEALER PAY $ 75 TO COMPLETE CHECK ON THE CAR INCLUDING THE FRAME TO BE IN THE SAFE SIDE .
PUT IT THIS WAY SO MANY CARS GETTING HIT EVERY DAY AND THEY ARE NOT REPORT IT TO THE POLICE SO CAR FAX WOULD NOT KNOW ABOUT THEM , MY POINT IS IF THE FRAME IS NOT TOUCHED AND IT WAS A FENDER BENDER THEN IT IS OK .
BECAUSE IF THE CAR FAX SHOWED NOTHING YOU WONT BE ASKING THIS QUESTION GO AHEAD AND TAKE IT FOR DRIVE THEN TAKE IT TO HONDA TO DO A FULL INSPECTION , AGAIN I WOULD LOSE $ 75- 100 BUT I WOULD NOT LOSE $ 8500 . PIECE OF MIND
Refugees and safe third country
RR (refugee-safe third country) Syria [2010] UKUT 422 (IAC) (13 November 2010)
The claimant was a national of Syria, married to a national of Algeria. In 2008 the Secretary of State for the Home Office (SSHO) rejected her asylum claim, with the intention to remove her to either Syria or Algeria. Her appeal was allowed on the grounds of asylum, humanitarian protection and Article 3 ECHR (torture and degrading treatment).
The SSHO obtained an order for reconsideration of the decision to remove the claimant to Algeria based on the Algerian nationality of her husband and children, and the fact she had lived previously in Algeria for nine months.
Regarding legal status, the claimant was a refugee from Syria, facing persecution for political opinion. Refugee status was determined in terms of the country of nationality, not any other country. Had the claimant had dual or multiple nationalities, she would only have been deemed a refugee had she been unable to avail herself of the protection of all the countries of which she was a national (R v A Special Adjudicator, ex p Abudine [1995] Imm AR 60; UNHCR Handbook at 106).
Once it was established that the claimant was a refugee, the appeal against removal to Algeria was allowable only if the removal would be in violation of Article 33 of the Refugee Convention (R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Adan and Aitsegeur [2000] UKHL 67; R (Yogathas) [2002] UKHL 36; TI v United Kingdom [2000] INLR 211). Article 33 prohibited the return of a refugee to countries where his/her life or freedom would be threatened on account of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion. Article 33 applied to any refugee, whatever the legal status of his/her presence under national law.
In contrast, in the UK, Article 32 of the Refugee Convention applied only to refugees who had been granted leave to enter and to stay under paragraph 334 of the Immigration Rules. Article 32 stipulated that refugees should not be expelled, except on grounds of national security or public order. However, refugee status would not of itself entitle the claimant to a grant of asylum (Secretary of State for the Home Department v ST (Eritrea) [2010] EWCA Civ 643).
It was no part of the definition of ‘refugee’ that the subject be formally recognised as such by the grant of asylum (ZN (Afghanistan) and Ors v Entry Clearance Officer (Karachi) [2010] UKSC 21). Thus, the claimant was not entitled to the protection of Article 32 because she had not been granted the right of lawful presence in the UK.
In the event the appeal was allowed by virtue of Article 33, which prohibited both direct and indirect return or expulsion to countries where life or freedom would be threatened (R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Adan and Aitsegeur [2000] UKHL 67). Co-operation between Syria and Algeria, as described by the Honorary Legal Adviser to the Algerian Embassy, was such that Algeria would ‘hand over opponents of the Syrian regime’. The claimant’s family history, personal circumstances and previous dealings with the Syrian authorities made it reasonably likely she would fall under such agreements. Her removal to Algeria would therefore be in direct contravention of Article 33, and contrary to the UK’s obligations under the Refugee Convention. Removal to Algeria would also violate the claimant’s Article 3 ECHR rights.
About the Author
If you would like further information as to our services and whether or not we can assist you in an appeal, please contact us on 0207 569 3035 or alternatively email us at info@ergensharif.co.uk. http://www.ergensharif.co.uk/Advocacy.aspx